I'd rather have 65s in the same situation. Suited hands might be overrated a bit, but offsuit hands are overrated even more imo. You're best off just looking at a poker course and using the hand charts they give you for each position. JTs just does 'better' against the ranges that typicall give it action. Another example is the Poker.S.Twoplustwo is the fastest poker hand. JTs can be played UTG in a 6-max game, but A8o cannot, even though A8 is technically 'ahead' in a heads up pot vs JTs. I encourage people to listen to the latest episode of High Roll Radio for. The ranking charts for Pokerstove/Equilab are better since they are based on raw equity vs 3 random hands, but in games where most pots are heads up or 3-way at maximum, the ranges/rankings are slightly different. I would aver that crunching the equities for 10 players with random hands is pretty much useless, because no one plays 10-handed games (for real money) in which no one ever folds. For multiway pots with deep stacks, 72o is generally considered the worst hand, because it doesn't make strong enough hands to beat multiple players very often, but in a heads up game 32o is the nut low, because it can't even beat one player. There are many ways to rank hands and none of them are perfect when speaking in general terms.
